Interface Journal.com
Home Features News Forum Company Contact Us Sponsors search, site map, login
  Grinding on UP | Rail Transit W/R I | Grinding Strategy (part 2 of 2) | P&S Directory | ARCHIVES  
 
  INTERVIEW

FRA Initiatives: Dr. Magdy El-Sibaie, Chief of FRA's Track Research Division


The Federal Railroad Administration's Office of Research and Development is not the best known R&D organization in the industry, but it is one of the most important. It's work figures prominently in rulemaking and the regulatory process for the industry. That role is significant in and of itself. But FRA's Office of R&D also actively contributes to and, in a very real sense, drives the industry's efforts to understand and improve vehicle/track interaction on U.S. railways.

Interface Journal Editor Bob Tuzik spoke with the Dr. Magdy El-Sibaie, Chief of FRA's Track and Rail Infrastructure Research Division, about FRA initiatives in the area of wheel/rail interaction on rail freight, commuter and Amtrak's high-speed passenger lines.

Interface Journal (IJ): FRA's R&D group has shown strong interest in wheel/rail interaction initiatives. What's the basis for it?

El-Sibaie: FRA's mandate is to assure safety on freight and passenger railways. Beyond regulating the industry for safety, we also promote to the degree possible best practices and industry guidelines.

IJ: When you say promote, do you mean initiate?

El-Sibaie: Initiate if necessary, but mostly promote when we recognize an industry practice that can be improved or better utilized. We work in partnership with the technical side of the industry to determine when an improved practice is needed, and we provide analytical support to various rule making activities by which engineering consensus is sought.

IJ: For example.

El-Sibaie: Let's look at wheel and rail profiles. Currently, FRA does not have safety standards that explicitly address wheel and rail profiles. The closest thing we have is in the high-speed rules in the area that addresses the risk of wheel climb. We know that flange angle is an important parameter in the wheel climb mechanism, but we haven't set a minimum requirement for flange angle. That's left up to the industry. But we take flange angle into account when analyzing the derailment quotient - the lateral to vertical load ratio - in the qualification of specific vehicles and equipment.

IJ: With that, are you moving toward establishing a minimum angle?

El-Sibaie: That is not for me to decide, but we are helping the industry from an R&D perspective better understand the role that flange angle plays in preventing or promoting wheel climb, and its role in the bigger picture of wheel/rail interaction. This includes the type and extent of contact between wheels and rails and the friction levels present in the contact interface. A wheelsets' angle of attack can also affect the level of derailment quotient above which wheel climb may occur. FRA R&D is working with the freight and passenger sides of the industry through the AAR [Association of American Railroads], APTA [American Public Transit Association] and other organizations to improve our understanding of these parameters and improve performance and safety.

On the passenger side of the industry, the flange angle issue came out of ongoing discussions within RSAC (Railway Safety Advisory Committee), which FRA formed to revise and update our high-speed standards. In these early discussions, it was agreed that three issues, flange angle, wheel conicity and truck equalization, would be best if first addressed by the industry, rather than through FRA rules. So APTA was given the task of looking at these three issues. FRA will decide after APTA makes its report whether it's appropriate to address these issues through a rule or a recommended practice.

Understand that I am only speaking for the R&D side of FRA, which supports and advises the Office of Safety on technical matters. We serve as internal advisors to the Office of Safety to determine the soundness of certain rule making proposals. We also look at applications from railroads to modify standards or to issue a waiver from a specific standard. We also work directly with the industry to advance the understanding of derailment mechanisms and the techniques that we can use to improve the safe operation of wheel and rail systems.

 PAGE 1 OF 5 |  NEXT PAGE >



OFFICIAL SPONSOR


Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details

Click here for details



SEPTEMBER 2004
"Optimizing Wheel and Rail Profiles on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor"
READ ARTICLE
SEPTEMBER 2004
"Developing an Enterprise Asset Management System for Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor"

READ ARTICLE
AUGUST 2004
"Moving from Exception- to Performance-based Track Geometry Monitoring Systems "
READ ARTICLE



Register to receive free editorial updates and current information from Interface Journal
CLICK HERE