Interface Journal
The Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction
Interface Journal
Navigation
  • Home
  • About Interface
  • Contact
  • Wheel Rail Seminars
  • Sponsorship
You are here: Home › Friction Management › Page 3
Currently browsing category

Friction Management

Reducing Noise and Vibration on NYCT

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Noise and Vibration, Rail Transit, Vehicle Design, Vehicle/Track

by Bob Tuzik, January 1, 2005 Any problem affecting the New York City Transit is by default a big problem. The process of transporting more than four million passengers per day in 6,000 vehicles on more than 700 miles of elevated, underground at-grade mainline tracks, on a system that operates 24 hours …

Drilling Down to Top-of-Rail Friction Control

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Rail Transit

by Bob Tuzik February 1, 2005 There are two primary approaches to friction management on rail transit systems: onboard and wayside. The most effective method depends upon the demands of the system. A relatively small system with consistent degrees of curvature, for example, might lend itself to onboard application. A system with …

Examining wheel/rail interaction on rail transit systems

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Gary Wolf, Noise and Vibration, Rail Grinding, Rail Transit, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Bob Tuzik • November 4, 2004 If the first unwritten rule in optimizing the wheel/rail interface on rail transit is: Know your system; the second rule should be: Recognize that the w/r interface is a system. “No single department can attack the issues in isolation and expect to get very far,” Joseph Oriolo, Senior …

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 1 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • October, 2009 Wear and rolling contact fatigue (RCF) of rails and wheels are common problems under heavy-haul operations. Increasing axle loads can increase the capacity of a railway system, but also can increase the stress state of the system. A root cause of RCF …

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 2 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • January 2010 See Part 1 of this article here. What are the differences between rail shapes that produce higher contact conicities and those that produce lower contact conicities? The profiles shown in Figures 1a and 1b illustrate the differences that can result in significant …

Reducing the Stress State on Canadian Pacific’s Western Corridor

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Maintenance, Rail Grinding

By Mike Roney • July, 2009  Canadian Pacific has taken a unique approach to reducing the stress state in its western corridor. The approach includes the implementation of distributed power and the implementation of friction management. It also includes examination of their combined effects — something that is relatively new. Looking at …

Pre-engineering the Wheel/Rail Interface

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Rail Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

By Rob Caldwell • October 2010 The wheel/rail interface is a complex system – one that benefits greatly from careful pre-engineering. There are significant benefits from properly addressing the wheel/rail interface, and serious consequences from allowing the interface to govern itself. While there are examples of both pre- and post-engineering scenarios, there …

Friction Management and Curve Elevation

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Track Geometry

By Mike Gilliam and Russell Rohlf • October 2010 Optimizing friction management is an ongoing project on Union Pacific. Gauge-face (GF) lubrication is a long-standing program, but it requires an additional 400 units to reach optimum efficiency. A large number of top-of-rail (TOR) units are needed, as well, as UP is only beginning …

← Previous Page

Search by Category

Related Articles

  • Total Friction Management on CPKC’s Thompson Subdivision and Beyond
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Friction Management: Implementation and State of Good Repair
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Developments in Top of Rail and Gage Face Friction Management Consumables
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Reducing the Stress State on Canadian Pacific’s Western Corridor
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Controlling Friction on Rail Transit Systems
    In relation to
    Friction Management

Sponsors

ENSCO

© 2025 Interface Journal

 

Loading Comments...