Interface Journal
The Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction
Interface Journal
Navigation
  • Home
  • About Interface
  • Contact
  • Wheel Rail Seminars
  • Advertisement & Sponsorship
You are here: Home › Rail Transit › Page 3
Currently browsing category

Rail Transit

Controlling Friction on Rail Transit Systems

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Rail Transit

By Bob Tuzik • January, 2007 Friction control plays a major role in reducing wear, noise and vibration, and managing wheel/rail interaction on rail transit systems. Controlling friction has become more achievable with the advent of engineered friction modifiers and improvements to wayside and onboard application systems for both traditional lubricants …

Introducing Low-Floor Vehicles into Older Transit Systems

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Transit, Vehicle/Track

By Roy E. Smith • March, 2006 The introduction of new, low-floor vehicles into existing North American transit systems has provided an attractive means of meeting current operating requirements. By the same token, their introduction has created a number of vehicle/track compatibility issues—particularly when these modern cars are introduced into older …

Fig4

Specialized Rail Profile Grinding on MBTA

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Grinding, Rail Maintenance, Rail Transit, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

by Bob Tuzik • April 10, 2005 Rail Grinding has been used to solve a host of problems on transit systems. It recently was used in Boston to remove a new wrinkle. A specialized grinding program was initiated in 2002 on the heels of a series of light-rail derailments on the …

Reducing Noise and Vibration on NYCT

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Noise and Vibration, Rail Transit, Vehicle Design, Vehicle/Track

by Bob Tuzik, January 1, 2005 Any problem affecting the New York City Transit is by default a big problem. The process of transporting more than four million passengers per day in 6,000 vehicles on more than 700 miles of elevated, underground at-grade mainline tracks, on a system that operates 24 hours …

Fig2

Drilling Down to Top-of-Rail Friction Control

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Rail Transit

by Bob Tuzik February 1, 2005 There are two primary approaches to friction management on rail transit systems: onboard and wayside. The most effective method depends upon the demands of the system. A relatively small system with consistent degrees of curvature, for example, might lend itself to onboard application. A system with …

Rail Fixation Reduces Vibration

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Noise and Vibration, Rail Transit

by Bob Tuzik, January 1, 2005 When NYCTA wanted a new fastener that was 35% “softer” than the softest DF fastener it had in use, a fastener that would not raise the track by more than 1-1/8 inches (30 mm), Dynamic Engineering designed the APT-BF system. The APT-BF fastener incorporates two elastic …

Flange Climb and Independently Rotating Wheels

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Transit, Vehicle/Track, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

by Bob Tuzik, December 1, 2004 Investigations have shown that wheel-flange/gauge-face angle and the coefficient of friction (COF) play significant roles in contributing to or preventing flange-climb derailments. Investigations have also shown that Light Rail Vehicles with Independently Rotating Wheels (IRWs) have a greater propensity for flange-climb derailment than vehicles with conventional …

Designing Amtrak’s Wayside Train/Track Interaction Detection System

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Measurement Systems, Rail Transit, Vehicle/Track

by Bob Tuzik, December 1, 2004 As part of its effort to monitor dynamic vehicle/track interaction on the Northeast Corridor, Amtrak commissioned ENSCO, Inc., to develop a Wayside Train/Track Interaction Detection System. The goal was to measure and collect information on vehicle/track forces that would enable Amtrak to determine the causes of …

Examining wheel/rail interaction on rail transit systems

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Gary Wolf, Noise and Vibration, Rail Grinding, Rail Transit, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Bob Tuzik • November 4, 2004 If the first unwritten rule in optimizing the wheel/rail interface on rail transit is: Know your system; the second rule should be: Recognize that the w/r interface is a system. “No single department can attack the issues in isolation and expect to get very far,” Joseph Oriolo, Senior …

Optimizing Wheel and Rail Profiles on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor

December 30, 2013 | Filed under: Rail Grinding, Rail Transit, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

by Eric E. Magel • September 20, 2004 Wheel wear is an inevitable byproduct of wheel/rail interaction. Excessive wear, however, indicates an imbalance in some aspect of the wheel/rail interface. Amtrak’s high-speed Acela trains, running on track with much greater curvature than other high-speed systems, were quickly found to exhibit very …

← Previous Page
Next Page →

Search by Category

Related Articles

  • Mitigating Rolling Contact Fatigue: An Overview for 2023
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Implementing Rail Grinding and Wheel/Rail Interface Optimization Programs on Heavy Haul and Transit Systems: Lessons Learned
    In relation to
    Noise and Vibration
  • WRI EU 2015, Part 2: Theory to Practice, Laboratory to Track
    In relation to
    Rail Grinding
  • Practical Rail Grinding
    In relation to
    Rail Grinding
  • Taking the Long View: 20 Years of Wheel/Rail Interaction (Part 1 of 2)
    In relation to
    Gary Wolf

Sponsors

ENSCO

© 2026 Interface Journal

 

Loading Comments...