Interface Journal
The Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction
Interface Journal
Navigation
  • Home
  • About Interface
  • Contact
  • Wheel Rail Seminars
  • Advertisement & Sponsorship
You are here: Home › Page 16
Featured

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 1 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • October, 2009 Wear and rolling contact fatigue (RCF) of rails and wheels are common problems under heavy-haul operations. Increasing axle loads can increase the capacity of a railway system, but also can increase the stress state of the system. A root cause of RCF …

Fig1 440x510

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 2 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • January 2010 See Part 1 of this article here. What are the differences between rail shapes that produce higher contact conicities and those that produce lower contact conicities? The profiles shown in Figures 1a and 1b illustrate the differences that can result in significant …

Photo 600x400

Engineering the Wheel/Rail Interface for Rail Transit

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Rail Transit, Track Geometry, Vehicle Design, Vehicle/Track, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Jeff Tuzik • July 2010 Wheel/rail interaction is complex, variable and difficult to manage — especially on rail transit systems where noise, vibration and ride quality present daily challenges. As a result, managing the wheel/rail interface requires constant attention and innovation. Speakers at Advanced Rail Management’s Rail Transit 2010 …

Fig2 600x450 (1)

The Basics of Successful Grinding (Part 2 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Maintenance, Rail Grinding

By Norman Hooper • July 2010 See Part 1. Experience has shown that an efficient and cost-effective rail grinding program requires attention to basic track inspection and maintenance procedures. This includes attention to “hot spots,” such as joints, welds and road crossings. Figure 1 shows a rail joint at the end …

Featured

Reducing the Stress State on Canadian Pacific’s Western Corridor

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Maintenance, Rail Grinding

By Mike Roney • July, 2009  Canadian Pacific has taken a unique approach to reducing the stress state in its western corridor. The approach includes the implementation of distributed power and the implementation of friction management. It also includes examination of their combined effects — something that is relatively new. Looking at …

Featured

The Basics of Successful Grinding (Part 1 of 2)

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Maintenance, Rail Grinding

By Norman Hooper • January 2010 It behooves railways to periodically review tie, fastener and surfacing maintenance practices, particularly as they relate to the planning and quality of rail grinding procedures. The use of technology, enhanced inspections, regular grinding cycles and friction modification can improve rail surface quality. The safety rationale …

Featured

A Measured Approach to Improvements in Rail Grinding

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Rail Grinding, Rail Maintenance

By Mike Gilliam and Russell Rohlfs • July 2010 The Union Pacific Railway has 30,000 mainline miles of track over 23, primarily, western states. It has more than 6,500 miles of curves, which require significant maintenance efforts, such as rail grinding and lubrication. It’s a challenge to manage the rail assets, …

Fig1 600x350

Pre-engineering the Wheel/Rail Interface

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Rail Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

By Rob Caldwell • October 2010 The wheel/rail interface is a complex system – one that benefits greatly from careful pre-engineering. There are significant benefits from properly addressing the wheel/rail interface, and serious consequences from allowing the interface to govern itself. While there are examples of both pre- and post-engineering scenarios, there …

Fig1 500x500

Friction Management and Curve Elevation

October 13, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Track Geometry

By Mike Gilliam and Russell Rohlf • October 2010 Optimizing friction management is an ongoing project on Union Pacific. Gauge-face (GF) lubrication is a long-standing program, but it requires an additional 400 units to reach optimum efficiency. A large number of top-of-rail (TOR) units are needed, as well, as UP is only beginning …

New AAR Maintenance Rules for Freight Car Trucks

January 4, 2007 | Filed under: Heavy Haul, Vehicle/Track

By Gary Wolf • January, 2007 The Association of American Railroads (AAR) has promulgated a new Rule 46 in the Field Manual of the AAR Interchange Rules. This new rule represents a comprehensive effort to codify under one umbrella many of the formerly fragmented rules dealing with truck wear limits, maintenance …

← Previous Page

Search by Category

Related Articles

  • Truck Warp: Causes and Cures (Part 2 of 2)
    In relation to
    Vehicle/Track
  • The truck bolster bowl: Is it a bowl or a bearing?
    In relation to
    Gary Wolf
  • Vehicle Side Bearings: Function, Performance and Maintenance (Part 2 of 2)
    In relation to
    Gary Wolf
  • Vehicle Side Bearings: Function, Performance and Maintenance (Part 1 of 2)
    In relation to
    Gary Wolf
  • Taking the Long View: 20 Years of Wheel/Rail Interaction (Part 2 of 2)
    In relation to
    Friction Management

Sponsors

ENSCO
Hollandlogo

© 2026 Interface Journal