Interface Journal
The Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction
Interface Journal
Navigation
  • Home
  • About Interface
  • Contact
  • Wheel Rail Seminars
  • Advertisement & Sponsorship
You are here: Home › Page 16
Slide1

Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part 2 of 2)

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary P. Wolf • January 1, 2005 Part 1 of “Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential” examined how wide gauge occurs, some of the symptoms and reasons why wide gauge is undesirable. Part 2 of this article explores how to correctly measure gauge and properly identify wide gauge …

Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part 1 of 2)

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary P. Wolf • December 1, 2004 “Wide gauge” is one of the most often used FRA derailment codes. In 2003, 254 derailments were reported to have been caused by wide gauge (FRA code T110 or T111). This represents nearly 13% of all derailments reported to the FRA, and roughly …

Designing Amtrak’s Wayside Train/Track Interaction Detection System

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Measurement Systems, Rail Transit, Vehicle/Track

by Bob Tuzik, December 1, 2004 As part of its effort to monitor dynamic vehicle/track interaction on the Northeast Corridor, Amtrak commissioned ENSCO, Inc., to develop a Wayside Train/Track Interaction Detection System. The goal was to measure and collect information on vehicle/track forces that would enable Amtrak to determine the causes of …

Examining wheel/rail interaction on rail transit systems

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Noise and Vibration, Rail Grinding, Rail Transit, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Bob Tuzik • November 4, 2004 If the first unwritten rule in optimizing the wheel/rail interface on rail transit is: Know your system; the second rule should be: Recognize that the w/r interface is a system. “No single department can attack the issues in isolation and expect to get very far,” Joseph Oriolo, Senior …

Inspection and Analysis of Switch Derailments (Part 2 of 2)

January 2, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Vehicle/Track, Wheel Maintenance

By Gary Wolf Part 1 of this article examined trailing-point derailments, facing-point derailments and thin flange wheels. Part 2 examines wheel climb and frog-related derailments. Crosslevel variances in turnout geometry represent a common cause of wheel-climb derailments. It’s not unusual to find bolted or insulated joints within 30 to 40 …

Switch Point Derailments: Is it the point or the wheel? (Part 1 of 2)

January 2, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Wheel Maintenance

By Gary Wolf No other type of derailment causes as much angst among railroaders as the switch point derailment. The switch point derailment can take several forms, but it generally boils down to a disagreement between the Mechanical Department that blames the switch point, and the Engineering Department that blames …

Optimizing Wheel and Rail Profiles on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor

December 30, 2013 | Filed under: Rail Grinding, Rail Transit, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

by Eric E. Magel • September 20, 2004 Wheel wear is an inevitable byproduct of wheel/rail interaction. Excessive wear, however, indicates an imbalance in some aspect of the wheel/rail interface. Amtrak’s high-speed Acela trains, running on track with much greater curvature than other high-speed systems, were quickly found to exhibit very …

Truck Warp: Causes and Cures (Part 2 of 2)

December 30, 2013 | Filed under: Vehicle/Track

By Gary P. Wolf • November 1, 2004 Part 1 of Truck Warp: Causes and Cures covered the three primary causes of truck warp: Part 2 of this article explores these causes in more detail and, more importantly, what can be done to prevent trucks from warping. Lack of sufficient …

Featured

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 1 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • October, 2009 Wear and rolling contact fatigue (RCF) of rails and wheels are common problems under heavy-haul operations. Increasing axle loads can increase the capacity of a railway system, but also can increase the stress state of the system. A root cause of RCF …

Fig1 440x510

Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 2 of 2)

October 18, 2013 | Filed under: Friction Management, Heavy Haul, Rail Grinding, Wheel Maintenance, Wheel/Rail Interaction

By Huimin Wu and Semih Kalay • January 2010 See Part 1 of this article here. What are the differences between rail shapes that produce higher contact conicities and those that produce lower contact conicities? The profiles shown in Figures 1a and 1b illustrate the differences that can result in significant …

← Previous Page
Next Page →

Search by Category

Related Articles

  • Management of the Wheel/Rail Contact Interface in Heavy-Haul Operations (Part 1 of 2)
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • Meeting the Industry’s Technology Goals
    In relation to
    Friction Management
  • WRI EU 2015, Part 2: Theory to Practice, Laboratory to Track
    In relation to
    International
  • Profile Optimization in the Urban Rail Context
    In relation to
    Measurement Systems
  • Optimizing Wheel and Rail Profiles on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor
    In relation to
    Rail Grinding

Sponsors

ENSCO
Hollandlogo

© 2026 Interface Journal

Loading Comments...