Interface Journal
The Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction
Interface Journal
Navigation
  • Home
  • About Interface
  • Contact
  • Wheel Rail Seminars
  • Advertisement & Sponsorship
You are here: Home › Track Geometry › Page 2
Currently browsing category

Track Geometry

Photo1x 500x300

Using Performance-Based Assessment of Reserve Gauge Strength to Enhance Tie-Replacement Planning

January 4, 2014 | Filed under: Track Geometry

By Robert Madderom Technology has changed the ways in which railroads plan most of their maintenance programs over the past 30 years. But one aspect of maintenance planning has remained static. Railways still select ties for replacement and plan a significant portion of their maintenance budgets based on visual inspections by …

Fig9 500x330

Understanding the Effects of Track Gauge, Wheel/Rail Geometry and Friction on Stresses at the Wheel/Rail Interface

January 4, 2014 | Filed under: Friction Management, Track Geometry, Wheel/Rail Interaction, Wheel/Rail Profile

By Jude Igwemezie, Ph.D., P.Eng. Over the years, rail grinding has become more the norm than the exception as the rail industry has recognized that damaged materials on the rail and wheel contact surfaces must be addressed before they become a bigger problem. The art of rail grinding has also progressed …

Fig1

Rail Cant Measurement of Concrete Crossties (Part 2 of 2)

January 4, 2014 | Filed under: Measurement Systems, Rail Cant, Track Geometry

By Arthur Clouse Part 1 of this article examined the mechanisms that cause rail seat abrasion on concrete ties. Part 2 looks at existing standards for concrete ties and the systems that can be used to measure their performance. The Federal Track Safety Standards prescribe minimum track geometry and track structure requirements for specific track …

Fig1 500x375

Rail Seat Abrasion: In-Track Repair

January 4, 2014 | Filed under: Measurement Systems, Rail Cant, Track Geometry

by Bob Tuzik, January, 2009 Rail seat abrasion on concrete ties has plagued railroads for nearly two decades, now. Abrasion ranging from less than 0.02 inches to more than 1 inch began appearing on curves on several of the major North American user railways in the early 1990s. The problem, which …

1 600x300

Rail Cant Measurement of Concrete Crossties (Part 1 of 2)

January 4, 2014 | Filed under: Measurement Systems, Rail Cant, Track Geometry

By Arthur Clouse • October, 2008 In response to accidents, unregulated causal factors and the National Transportation Safety Board’s recommendation (NTSB R-06-19), the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Safety together with the Office of Research and Development initiated a study to identify and evaluate the safety of concrete crossties. …

Curve Superelevation: Problems and Solutions

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary Wolf • January, 2006 Railroad engineering managers have been struggling with the problem of how much elevation to place in a curve since the first steam engines started turning a wheel. While the physics and calculus of the matter seem straightforward, the application of those formulas is where problems …

FRA Initiatives: Dr. Magdy El-Sibaie, Chief of FRA’s Track Research Division

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Maintenance, Measurement Systems, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Bob Tuzik • May 26, 2005 The Federal Railroad Administration’s Office of Research and Development is not the best known R&D organization in the industry, but it is one of the most important. It’s work figures prominently in rulemaking and the regulatory process for the industry. That role is …

Rock ’til You Drop: Starting and Stopping Harmonic Rock and Roll

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary Wolf • February 1, 2005 It’s said that “it takes two to tango,” but it takes three critical elements to induce harmonic rock and roll: Like many of the other legendary “rockers,” freight car rock and roll came to the forefront in the ‘70s. The introduction of high-center-of-gravity, 100-ton …

Slide1

Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part 2 of 2)

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary P. Wolf • January 1, 2005 Part 1 of “Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential” examined how wide gauge occurs, some of the symptoms and reasons why wide gauge is undesirable. Part 2 of this article explores how to correctly measure gauge and properly identify wide gauge …

Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part 1 of 2)

January 3, 2014 | Filed under: Rail Maintenance, Track Geometry, Vehicle/Track

By Gary P. Wolf • December 1, 2004 “Wide gauge” is one of the most often used FRA derailment codes. In 2003, 254 derailments were reported to have been caused by wide gauge (FRA code T110 or T111). This represents nearly 13% of all derailments reported to the FRA, and roughly …

← Previous Page
Next Page →

Search by Category

Related Articles

  • Effects of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part 2 of 2)
    In relation to
    Rail Maintenance
  • Digging Into Cause Codes for Track-Related Derailments
    In relation to
    Derailment
  • Using Derailment Findings to Identify Derailment Risks
    In relation to
    Derailment
  • Switch Point Derailments: Is it the point or the wheel? (Part 1 of 2)
    In relation to
    Rail Maintenance
  • Effects of Secondary Suspension Imbalance on Wheel-Climb Potential (Part 1 of 2)
    In relation to
    Vehicle/Track

Sponsors

ENSCO
Hollandlogo

© 2026 Interface Journal

 

Loading Comments...